Why is continuous monitoring recommended when interim controls are implemented?

Continuous monitoring is recommended when interim controls are implemented primarily to ensure ongoing effectiveness. Interim controls are temporary measures put in place to reduce lead hazards, such as encapsulation or localized cleaning. However, these controls require regular assessment to confirm that they are working as intended and are maintaining a safe environment.

Ongoing monitoring allows for the identification of any potential deterioration or failure of the controls, which is essential for preventing exposure to lead hazards. By consistently evaluating the effectiveness of these measures, practitioners can make timely adjustments or escalate to more permanent solutions if necessary, ensuring the safety and health of occupants.

The other options address different aspects but do not fully capture the crucial reason behind continuous monitoring. For example, avoiding future abatement or assessing property transformation may be outcomes of successful interim controls, but they do not directly relate to the need for ongoing oversight of the effectiveness of those controls. Additionally, tenant satisfaction is important but is not the primary focus when discussing the continued efficacy of lead hazard controls.